 |
|
|
|  |
|
News: Hypocritical Mexicans!
|
|
Without further preamble, let's just say that all the Mexicans in this country who are protesting for their "rights" and all the Mexicans in Mexico who answered polls and said that WE are racists for wanting to enforce our country's laws are hypocrites and/or flat out lying weasels. They are playing the willing media and the Democrats looking for more stupid voters to the hilt, and they're so full of Barbara Streisand we could sprinkle them on our lawns as fertilizer. What do I mean?
In Mexico, more than 75% of those polled oppose making illegal presence in America a crime. Yes, I know how stupid that sounds, since the term "illegal" should, by definition, mean a "crime" has been committed, but apparently in this country crossing the border illegally is no worse than jaywalking. At any rate, Mexicans think it's just horrible that we would criminalize their criminals. Funny, because in Mexico it is a FELONY to be in the country illegally, punishable by two years in prison and/or deportation. No amnesty, no asylum. You come illegally, you get caught, you leave or you go to jail or both. What's good for Mexico is opposed by Mexicans when it's proposed here. Could they be more two faced?
Here, ILLEGAL foreign invaders march around in our streets demanding "rights" that don't exist and they have no grounds to ask for, then call us all kinds of names for daring to say no. In Mexico, foreigners, even LEGAL ones, have no rights and could be jailed or expelled merely for asking for them. Illustration? Very well, how about straight from the Mexican constitution?
---Article 33: “Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country.”
---Article 9 states, “only citizens of the Republic may do so to take part in the political affairs of the country.”--referring to protests or other forms of political expression.
---Article 33: “the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action.”
Illegal aliens own homes and businesses here. In Mexico, that would never happen, and even legal immigrants have few rights towards property:
---Article 27 states, “Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization and Mexican companies have the right to acquire ownership of lands, waters, and their appurtenances, or to obtain concessions for the exploitation of mines or of waters. The State may grant the same right to foreigners, provided they agree before the Ministry of Foreign Relations to consider themselves as nationals in respect to such property, and bind themselves not to invoke the protection of their governments in matters relating thereto; under penalty, in case of noncompliance with this agreement, of forfeiture of the property acquired to the Nation. Under no cir*****stances may foreigners acquire direct ownership of lands or waters within a zone of one hundred kilometers along the frontiers and of fifty kilometers along the shores of the country.”
Illegals here demand workers' rights and the Mexican president demands that his citizens (illegal invaders) in this country be treated properly. Funny thing, it sure doesn't work that way in Mexico:
---Article 32: “Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners under equality of cir*****stances for all classes of concessions and for all employment, positions, or commissions of the Government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable. In time of peace no foreigner can serve in the Army nor in the police or public security forces.”
---Article 32 bans foreigners, immigrants,and even naturalized citizens of Mexico from serving as military officers, Mexican-flagged ship and airline crew, and chiefs of seaports and airports.
---Article 11 guarantees federal protection against “undesirable aliens resident in the country.”
Illegal aliens here oppose (as if they have any say) local or state authorities being allowed to enforce immigration law, yet in Mexico those same authorities do just that, without authorization. In addition:
---Article 16 states, “in cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and
his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities.”
When it comes to even legal residents, in Mexico foreign-born, naturalized Mexican citizens may not become federal lawmakers (Article 55), cabinet secretaries (Article 91) or supreme court justices (Article 95). They also may not become priests of any kind (Article 130). Only natural-born Mexicans can.
Here, we hear about how illegals are here, but since their children were born here we have to leave them alone. In Mexico, they don't care about that. In fact, in at least one case being a natural-born Mexican isn't enough. Article 82 of the Mexican constitution mandates that the president’s parents also be Mexican-born citizens.
Bottom line? All the things that we are being told we can't do to illegal Mexicans in this country are being done to illegal aliens by Mexicans in THAT country and worse! We're not supposed to have "vigilantes" picking on Mexicans in our country illegally, but just look what happens to illegals in Mexico:
At least here, if you're a legal immigrant you have many of the same rights that citizens do. Not so in Mexico. So the next time a Mexican sympathizer starts whining about "immigrants' rights" and all that nonsense, refer them to the Mexicans' own constitution and ask them one question.
If it's good enough for Mexicans in Mexico, why isn't good enough for Mexicans HERE?!
I have a compromise for all the liberals who think we're so evil towards the poor Mexicans. I agree to legislation that only does one thing. We'll call it the Mexican Immigrant Rights Constitutional Reciprocity Act. American immigration law will be changed so that foreigners, legal and illegal, have EXACTLY THE SAME RIGHTS AS THEY WOULD IF THEY WERE IN MEXICO.
That's only fair, right?
RIGHT?
|
| |
Average Score: 3.85
Votes: 7
|
|
|
|
